Organizations that choose to implement one single system with all desired applications from a single vendor is said to have chosen a:

Organizations that choose to implement one single system with all desired applications from a single vendor is said to have chosen a:

• A. Single integrator solution
• B. Premier application solution
• C. Best-of-breed solution
• D. Elite integrator solution

Answer: (A)

Choosing one vendor to provide all desired applications creates an integrated, uniform environment where everything works together out of the box. This is described as a single integrator solution: the vendor acts as the sole provider and integrator of all modules, so data models, interfaces, and upgrades line up across the entire system. The main benefit is reduced complexity and risk—there are fewer integration points to manage, smoother data flow, simpler maintenance, and a more consistent user experience. In contrast, a best-of-breed approach selects the best individual applications from multiple vendors to maximize functionality in each area, but it introduces many integration points, data mapping challenges, and maintenance overhead, making the system more complex to upgrade and support. The other terms mentioned aren’t standard descriptors for this setup and don’t convey the single-vendor, fully integrated idea as clearly.

Choosing one vendor to provide all desired applications creates an integrated, uniform environment where everything works together out of the box. This is described as a single integrator solution: the vendor acts as the sole provider and integrator of all modules, so data models, interfaces, and upgrades line up across the entire system. The main benefit is reduced complexity and risk—there are fewer integration points to manage, smoother data flow, simpler maintenance, and a more consistent user experience.

In contrast, a best-of-breed approach selects the best individual applications from multiple vendors to maximize functionality in each area, but it introduces many integration points, data mapping challenges, and maintenance overhead, making the system more complex to upgrade and support. The other terms mentioned aren’t standard descriptors for this setup and don’t convey the single-vendor, fully integrated idea as clearly.